{"id":7057,"date":"2026-01-07T17:51:00","date_gmt":"2026-01-07T17:51:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.prolimehost.com\/blogs\/?p=7057"},"modified":"2026-01-07T17:54:21","modified_gmt":"2026-01-07T17:54:21","slug":"why-elastic-performance-is-a-finance-risk-not-a-technical-advantage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.prolimehost.com\/blogs\/why-elastic-performance-is-a-finance-risk-not-a-technical-advantage\/","title":{"rendered":"Why \u201cElastic Performance\u201d Is a Finance Risk, Not a Technical Advantage"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

For more than a decade, \u201celastic performance\u201d has been marketed as one of cloud computing\u2019s greatest strengths. The promise is simple: scale up when demand spikes, scale down when it drops, and only pay for what you use.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Technically, that sounds efficient. Financially, it\u2019s anything but.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As more finance leaders dig into infrastructure spend, a quiet realization is taking hold: elasticity may solve engineering problems, but it creates real risk for forecasting, budgeting, and long-term ROI.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n

Table of Contents<\/p>\nToggle<\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n